Sunday, September 23, 2012

Is marketing Really Dead?

The first glimpse of the title of this article, I was shocked – how could marketing be dead? If so, what is the meaning for me to learning it right now? After read through the article, I found that “marketing is dead” actually is refer to the traditional marketing. Instead, the author, Bill Lee, pointed out that the future marketing will be replaced by social media which is more customer-oriented. However, I need to argue about Bill’s opinions somehow.

First of all, I have to admit that I agree with the author to some extent. The three parts of evidence Bill provided is objective and persuasive. In real life, Take me as an example, as a customer, I always look up the information or comments from internet before I make the decision for my purchase. Also, CEO nowadays pays more attention to the result instead of the process. For instance, CEO from my company currently laid of many employees from marketing department, because the company keeps losing money. Often, marketing is the department that takes the most responsibility for the company’s equity. In addition, the tendency of marketing today is more about the experience – user experience, feedback, comments, etc. Just like a company would not hire people who have no related experience, and know nothing about the filed.

Because there is a saying that "customers are gods", the four ways Bill mentioned that how marketing should guide the customers are all from the customers’ aspects. Nevertheless, those four means are partially, but not absolutely right.

To restore community marketing is applicable, because customers need a place to exchange opinions and user experience. The problem is that the comments from the customers are subjective – everyone has different thoughts on one thing, just like two leaves are the same. Moreover, it is hard for the company to define whether all the feedback is from the real customers or not. Sometimes, competitors may hire people to defame their rival’s products or service. It would be better if the customer can combine the community information with the traditional marketing information from the company. Finding customer influencers and assist them to establish social capital is a win-win solution for both company and customers. However, it is not easy to do so, and most of the customers they actually prefer the real incentives, such as coupons and discounts, rather than networking abilities. The part about getting customer advocates involved is a great idea from my aspect. It is not only because referral is more persuasive, but also has more infection to the target customers.

In my point of view, Bill’s future marketing is more like a pull marketing strategy, and traditional marketing from his opinion is nothing but a push marketing strategy. In real life, pull strategy is more ideal, but push strategy, such as adverting is essential. Without push strategy, how could the company reach the mass customers at first step? The best and most effective way would be combine those two strategies as push-pull strategy. Although digital marketing may become more popular in the future, marketers should not fully abandon traditional marketing.
 
Reference: Bill Lee, Marketing is Dead

3 comments:

  1. Julia,
    Can I say that great minds think alike? haha~we generate the same question about the article title! Also, I do agree that there will be some hidden competition if comments are the only considered factors. Companies would hire witters to lead the comment and competitors would post some negative “feedback”. As a result, the whole market would be full of fraud and comments would not be trustable anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great discussion. I like the pull-push strategy idea best. Traditional marketing will never lose its position.

    But I have a different opinion on establishing the customer social capital. You mentioned in your post that customer prefer real incentives,such as coupons, rather than social capital. I have a different view at this point.
    I trust real incentives can only give customers a temporary motivation, leading to one time purchase but not solid long-time customer relationship. In contrast, social capital can provide customers emotional satisfaction towards the brand by telling the customers that they are important and valuable for the company. As I mentioned in my post the "Nettwerk" case. Nettwerk treated the tribe leaders with unreleased news of famous artists, resulting in great amount of followers of each tribe leader. The leader will be pride and self-satisfied with this exclusive treat. Therefore, they are willing to play the leader character and to promote the artists. In addition, it may bring the leaders physical profit besides the emotional satisfaction. Social capital can be developed as a long-term solid relationship between company and customer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Julia, I have to say that I enjoyed a lot reading your blog every time. You have great thoughts and points of view. Well done.
    I was also thinking of bar codes and QR codes. It seems like that bar code is very popular now. But it still has limits. QR codes contain more information which can be adopted widely. Personally, I love to see QR codes application on e-ticket business. I watched a lot of games and shows, not once did I see the QR codes on those tickets. For plane tickets or tickets which required higher security level, QR codes can be a perfect choice.

    ReplyDelete